You are currently viewing Reabilitação de arco total utilizando implantes dentários com nova superfície/desenho para carga imediata. Série de casos com 24 meses de acompanhamento

Reabilitação de arco total utilizando implantes dentários com nova superfície/desenho para carga imediata. Série de casos com 24 meses de acompanhamento

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

Referências

  1. Lekholm U, Zarb GA. Patient selection. In: Brånemark PI, Zarb GA, Albrektsson T. Tissue integrated prostheses. Osseointegration in Clinical Dentistry. Chicago: Quintessence, 1986. p.199-209.
  2. Buser D, Sennerby L, De Bruyn H. Modern implant dentistry based on osseointegration: 50 years of progress, current trends, and open questions. Periodontol 2000 2017;73(1):7-21.
  3. De Bruyn H, Raes S, Ostman PO, Cosyn J. Immediate loading in partially and completely edentulous jaws: a review of the literature with clinical guidelines. Periodontol 2000 2014;66(1):153-87.
  4. Luiz J, Luiz JH, Sukekava F. Experiência de uso e curva de aprendizado com uma nova superfície/desenho de implante dentário para carga imediata: estudo preliminar. ImplantNews Reab Oral 2020;5(4):562-71.
  5. Emmert M, Gülses A, Behrens E, Karayürek F, Acil Y, Wiltfang J et al. An experimental study on the effects of the cortical thickness and bone density on initial mechanical anchorage of different Straumann implant designs. Int J Implant Dent 2021;30;7(1):83.
  6. Emmert M, Spille J, Behrens E, Ayna M, Karayurek F, Wiltfang J et al. Comparative assessment of the primary stability of Straumann BLX implant design using an in-vitro sinus lift-simultaneous implant insertion model. J Oral Implantol 2021 (DOI: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-20-00411).
  7. Francisco H, Finelle G, Bornert F, Sandgren R, Herber V, Warfving N et al. Peri-implant bone preservation of a novel, self-cutting, and fully tapered implant in the healed crestal ridge of minipigs: submerged vs. transgingival healing. Clin Oral Investig 2021;25(12):6821-32.
  8. Feine J, Abou-Ayash S, Mardini MA, de Santana RB, Bjelke-Holtermann T, Bornstein MM et al. Group 3 ITI Consensus Report: patient-reported outcome measures associated with implant dentistry. Clin Oral Implants Res 2018;29(suppl.16):270-5.
  9. Heitz-Mayfield LJA, Heitz F, Lang NP. Implant disease risk assessment IDRA – a tool for preventing peri-implant disease. Clin Oral Implants Res 2020;31(4):397-403.
  10. Gotfredsen K, Hosseini M, Rimborg S, Özhayat E. Patient’s perception of timing concepts in implant dentistry: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2021;32(suppl.21):67-84.
  11. Morton D, Gallucci G, Lin W-S, Pjetursson B, Polido W, Roehling S et al. Group 2 ITI Consensus Report: prosthodontics and implant dentistry. Clin Oral Implants Res 2018;29(suppl.16):215-23.
  12. Berglundh T, Abrahamsson I, Lang NP, Lindhe J. De novo alveolar bone formation adjacent to endosseous implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003;14(3):251-62.
  13. Fortin T, Isidori M, Bouchet H. Placement of posterior maxillary implants in partially edentulous patients with severe bone deficiency using CAD/CAM guidance to avoid sinus grafting: a clinical report of procedure. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24(1):96-102.
  14. Roccuzzo M, Layton DM, Roccuzzo A, Heitz-Mayfield LJ. Clinical outcomes of peri-implantitis treatment and supportive care: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2018;29(suppl.16):331-50.