You are currently viewing Performance clínica de próteses fixas obtidas por CAD/CAM e técnica convencional

Performance clínica de próteses fixas obtidas por CAD/CAM e técnica convencional

Estudo avalia próteses unitárias ou múltiplas confeccionadas por CAD/CAM comparadas à técnica convencional.

AUTORES

Larissa Dolfini Alexandrino
Cirurgiã-dentista, especialista em Prótese Dentária e DTM, mestra e doutoranda em Clínica Odontológica na área de Prótese Dentária – FOP-Unicamp. Orcid: 0000-0003-0289-1006.

Milton Edson Miranda
Cirurgião-dentista, mestre e doutor em Prótese Dentária, e professor – Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic. Orcid: 0000-0002-5410-6500.

Ingrid Andrade Meira
Cirurgiã-dentista, especialista em Prótese Dentária e DTM, e doutora em Clínica Odontológica na área de Prótese Dentária – FOP-Unicamp. Orcid: 0000-0002-3631-0030.

Pedro de Penha Coutinho Nina Duarte
Cirurgião-dentista, especialista em Prótese Dentária e DTM, mestre em Diagnóstico Bucal e professor – Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic. Orcid: 0000-0002-3388-2105.

RESUMO

Objetivo: avaliar a performance clínica de próteses unitárias ou múltiplas confeccionadas por CAD/CAM comparadas à técnica convencional. Material e métodos: a revisão sistemática foi realizada a partir das diretrizes do Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (Prisma) e registrada no International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (Prospero). A estratégia de busca foi realizada nas bases de dados PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, Lilacs e literatura cinzenta entre janeiro de 2009 e outubro de 2020. Estudos clínicos randomizados e não randomizados foram analisados em relação aos aspectos de taxa de sobrevivência, adaptação marginal e cáries. O risco de viés e a qualidade de evidência também foram descritos. Resultados: três estudos clínicos randomizados e um estudo prospectivo foram incluídos (n=4). O acompanhamento de 335 pacientes nos estudos foi realizado entre 24 e 60 meses. A performance clínica das próteses unitárias produzidas por CAD/CAM foi semelhante à técnica convencional, apenas o ouro foi considerado estatisticamente melhor. Já as infraestruturas de próteses múltiplas digitais tiveram resultados piores em adaptação marginal quando comparadas às tradicionais, embora tenham apresentado um comportamento similar nos outros desfechos. O risco de viés foi considerado moderado em três artigos incluídos e apenas um com baixo risco, porém todos tiveram baixa certeza de evidência. Conclusão: os estudos sugerem que as coroas feitas por CAD/CAM são comparáveis às confeccionadas pela técnica convencional nos desfechos avaliados, porém as infraestruturas de próteses múltiplas ainda apresentam problemas de adaptação. Mais estudos são necessários para afirmar a performance clínica a longo prazo de próteses produzidas por CAD/CAM.

Palavras-chave – Desenho assistido por computador; Coroas; Prótese parcial fixa; Revisão sistemática.

ABSTRACT

Objective: to evaluate the clinical performance of single crown or multiple-unit prostheses made by CAD/CAM compared to the conventional technique. Material and methods: a systematic review was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (Prisma) and was registered and approved in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (Prospero). The search strategy was carried out in the PubMed-MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, Lilacs and Gray Literature from January 2009 to October 2020. Random and non-randomized clinical studies were analyzed concerning the survival rate, marginal adaptation, and caries. The risk of bias and quality of evidence were also described. Results: three randomized clinical studies and one prospective study were included (n=4). Nearly 335 patients were followed-up between 24 and 60 months. Clinical performance of the CAD/CAM crowns was similar to the conventional technique, only gold crowns was considered statistically superior. CAD/CAM multiple-unit infrastructures had inferior results in marginal adaptation compared to traditional, although they had similar behavior in other outcomes. The risk of bias was considered moderate in the 3 articles included, all in all, just one presented low risk even though the 3 of them had low certainty of evidence. Conclusion: therefore, studies suggest that the crowns made by CAD/ CAM are comparable to those made by the conventional technique in the outcomes evaluated, but multiple prostheses infrastructures still have adaptation problems. More studies are needed to affirm long-term clinical performance of CAD/CAM prostheses.

Key words – Computer-aided design; Crowns; Denture partial fixed; Systematic review.

Referências

  1. Seidel A, Belli R, Breidebach N, Wichmann M, Matta RE. The occlusal wear of ceramic fixed dental prostheses: 3-year results in a randomized controlled clinical trial with split-mouth design. J Dent 2020;103:103500.
  2. Li RW, Chow TW, Matinlinna JP. Ceramic dental biomaterials and CAD/CAM technology: state of the art. J Prosthodont Res 2014;58(4):208-16.
  3. von Maltzahn NF, Bernhard F, Kohorst P. Fitting accuracy of ceramic veneered Co-Cr crowns produced by different manufacturing processes. J Adv Prosthodont 2020;12(2):100-6.
  4. Mühlemann S, Benic GI, Fehmer V, Hämmerle CHF, Sailer I. Randomized controlled clinical trial of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of zirconia-ceramic posterior fixed partial dentures. Part II: time efficiency of CAD-CAM versus conventional laboratory procedures. J Prosthet Dent 2019;121(2):252-7.
  5. Haddadi Y, Bahrami G, Isidor F. Accuracy of crowns based on digital intraoral scanning compared to conventional impression-a split-mouth randomised clinical study. Clin Oral Investig 2019;23(11):4043-50.
  6. Ahrberg D, Lauer HC, Ahrberg M, Weigl P. Evaluation of fit and efficiency of CAD/CAM fabricated all-ceramic restorations based on direct and indirect digitalization: a double-blinded, randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig 2016;20(2):291-300.
  7. Ahmadi E, Tabatabaei MH, Sadr SM, Atri F. Comparison of the marginal discrepancy of PFM crowns in the CAD/CAM and lost-wax fabrication techniques by triple scanning. Dent Med Probl 2020;57(4):417-22.
  8. Beuer F, Korczynski N, Rezac A, Naumann M, Gernet W, Sorensen JA. Marginal and internal fit of zirconia based fixed dental prostheses fabricated with different concepts. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent 2010;25(2):5-11.
  9. Miyazaki T, Hotta Y, Kunii J, Kuriyama S, Tamaki Y. A review of dental CAD/CAM: current status and future perspectives from 20 years of experience. Dent Mater J 2009;28(1):44-56.
  10. Passia N, Stampf S, Strub JR. Five-year results of a prospective randomised controlled clinical trial of posterior computer-aided design-computer-aided manufacturing ZrSiO4 -ceramic crowns. J Oral Rehabil 2013;40(8):609-17.
  11. Koutsoukis T, Zinelis S, Eliades G, Al-Wazzan K, Rifaiy MA, Al Jabbari YS. Selective laser melting technique of Co-Cr dental alloys: a review of structure and properties and comparative analysis with other available techniques. J Prosthodont 2015;24(4):303-12.
  12. Cehreli MC, Kökat AM, Akça K. CAD/CAM zirconia vs. slip-cast glass-infiltrated alumina/zirconia all-ceramic crowns: 2-year results of a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Appl Oral Sci 2009;17(1):49-55.
  13. Forrer FA, Schnider N, Brägger U, Yilmaz B, Hicklin SP. Clinical performance and patient satisfaction obtained with tooth-supported ceramic crowns and fixed partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent 2020;124(4):446-53.
  14. Vetromilla BM, Opdam NJ, Leida FL, Sarkis-Onofre R, Demarco FF, van der Loo MPJ et al. Treatment options for large posterior restorations: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. J Am Dent Assoc 2020;151(8):614-624.e18.
  15. Guess PC, Selz CF, Steinhart YN, Stampf S, Strub JR. Prospective clinical split-mouth study of pressed and CAD/CAM all-ceramic partial-coverage restorations: 7-year results. Int J Prosthodont 2013;26(1):21-5.
  16. Wang G, Zhang S, Bian C, Kong H. Interface toughness of a zirconia-veneer system and the effect of a liner application. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112(3):576-83.
  17. De Jager N, Pallav P, Feilzer AJ. The influence of design parameters on the FEA-determined stress distribution in CAD-CAM produced all-ceramic dental crowns. Dent Mater 2005;21(3):242-51.
  18. Pjetursson BE, Sailer I, Makarov NA, Zwahlen M, Thoma DS. All-ceramic or metal-ceramic tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs)? A systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Part II: multiple-unit FDPs. Dent Mater 2015;31(6):624-39.
  19. Yamamoto LT, Rodrigues VA, Dornelles LS, Bottino MA, Valandro LF, de Melo RM. Low-fusing porcelain glaze application on 3Y-TZP surfaces can enhance zirconia-porcelain adhesion. Braz Dent J 2016;1;27(5):543-7.
  20. Shim JS, Lee JS, Lee JY, Choi YJ, Shin SW, Ryu JJ. Effect of software version and parameter settings on the marginal and internal adaptation of crowns fabricated with the CAD/CAM system. J Appl Oral Sci 2015;23(5):515-22.
  21. Patel S, Bay RC, Glick M. A systematic review of dental recall intervals and incidence of dental caries. J Am Dent Assoc 2010;141(5):527-39.
Tags: , , , , ,