You are currently viewing Deslize apical do retalho associado ao cicatrizador personalizado para recondicionamento peri-implantar

Deslize apical do retalho associado ao cicatrizador personalizado para recondicionamento peri-implantar

Relato de caso apresenta técnica simples para o estabelecimento de um perfil de emergência adequado reposicionando o tecido peri-implantar e restabelecendo saúde e estética.

AUTORES

Vinicius Rizzo Marques
Doutor em Reabilitação Oral – FOB/ USP; Coordenador do Mestrado em Reabilitação Oral e Implantes – PUCMM, República Dominicana.
Orcid: 0000-0002-9749-876X.

Samira Sandy Ferreira Strelhow
Doutora em Reabilitação Oral – FOB/USP; Professora da especialização em Prótese Dentária – CPO/Centro de Pós-Graduação.
Orcid: 0000-0001-8929-7215.

Henrique Müller de Quevedo
Doutor em Reabilitação Oral – FOB/USP; Professor da especialização em Prótese Dentária – CPO/Centro de Pós-Graduação.
Orcid: 0000-0001-7762-5146.

Patrick Henry Machado Alves
Doutor em Reabilitação Oral – FOB/USP; Professor de Periodontia e Clínica Integrada – Unisagrado.
Orcid: 0000-0002-9749-876X.

RESUMO

Uma paciente do sexo feminino com 52 anos de idade foi referida de outro profissional para instalação de prótese sobre implante na região do 26. Clinicamente, o implante apresentava-se levemente palatinizado e a prótese confeccionada de maneira inadequada, onde o perfil de emergência não se apresentava condicionado, impedindo uma correta manutenção dos tecidos peri-implantares. Foi realizado um deslize apical do retalho, associado com a instalação de um cicatrizador personalizado, para proporcionar um perfil de emergência adequado. A prótese foi confeccionada seguindo a nova forma gengival, proporcionando uma correta higienização e estabilidade dos tecidos adjacentes. A modalidade de tratamento descrita mostrou-se bastante efetiva, simples e sem maiores complicações para a paciente, além de simples e de custo aceitável, podendo ser aplicada de maneira confiável.

Palavras-chave – Implantação dentária; Procedimentos cirúrgicos bucais; Prótese dentária; Implante dentário; Periodontia; Gengiva; Periodonto.

ABSTRACT

This paper reports a 52-year-old female patient referred from another professional for installation of an implant prosthesis in the region of tooth #26. Clinically, the implant was slightly palatal and the prosthesis was inadequately made, with the emergency profile being not conditioned and preventing correct maintenance of peri-implant tissues. In this way, an apical sliding flap was performed, associated with the installation of a customized healing abutment to provide an adequate emergency profile. The prosthesis was made following the new gingival form, providing correct hygiene and stability of adjacent tissues. The treatment modality described in this case proved to be very effective, simple, and without major patient complications, being its application simple and of acceptable costs.

Key words – Dental implantation; Oral surgical procedures; Dental prosthesis; Dental implants; Periodontics; Gingiva; Periodontium.

Recebido em ago/2021
Aprovado em ago/2021

Referências

  1. Romanos GE, Delgado-Ruiz R, Sculean A. Concepts for prevention of complications in implant therapy. Periodontol 2000 2019;81(1):7-17.
  2. Machtei EE. What do we do after an implant fails? A review of treatment alternatives for failed implants. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2013;33(4):111-9.
  3. Roy M, Loutan L, Garavaglia G, Hashim D. Removal of osseointegrated dental implants: a systematic review of explantation techniques. Clin Oral Investig 2020;24(1):47-60.
  4. Iványi D, Kivovics P. Indications and methods of removing dental implants. World J Dent 2018;9(3):180-6.
  5. Yilmaz B, Abou-Ayash S. A digital intraoral implant scan technique using a combined healing abutment and scan body system. J Prosthet Dent 2020;123(2):206-9.
  6. Sakka S, Baroudi K, Nassani MZ. Factors associated with early and late failure of dental implants. J Investig Clin Dent 2012;3(4):258-61.
  7. Bragger U, Heitz-Mayfield LJ. ITI Treatment Guide: biological and hardware complications in implant dentistry (vol. 8). Berlin: Quintessenz Verlags, 2015.
  8. Schwarz MS. Mechanical complications of dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000;11(suppl.1):156-8.
  9. Moulding MB, Loney RW, Ritsco RG. Marginal accuracy of provisional restorations fabricated by different techniques. Int J Prosthodont 1994;7(5):468-72.
  10. Harrison JS, Stratemann S, Redding SW. Dental implants for patients who have had radiation treatment for head and neck cancer. Spec Care Dentist 2003;23(6):223-9.
  11. Albrektsson T, Chrcanovic B, Östman PO, Sennerby L. Initial and long-term crestal bone responses to modern dental implants. Periodontology 2000 2017;73(1):41-50.
  12. Jimbo R, Albrektsson T. Long-term clinical success of minimally and moderately rough oral implants: a review of 71 studies with 5 years or more of follow-up. Implant Dent 2015;24(1):62-9.
  13. Alves PHM, Alves TCLP, Pegoraro TA, Costa YM, Bonfante EA, de Almeida ALPF. Measurement properties of gingival biotype evaluation methods. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2018;20(3):280-4.
  14. Stumpel LJ, Wadhwani C. A customized healing abutment for immediate and delayed implant cases. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2017;38(10):672-8.
  15. Alshhrani WM, Al Amri MD. Customized CAD-CAM healing abutment for delayed loaded implants. J Prosthet Dent 2016;116(2):176-9.
  16. Proussaefs P. Immediate provisionalization with a CAD/CAM interim abutment and crown: a guided soft tissue healing technique. J Prosthet Dent 2015;113(2):91-5.
  17. Mihali SG, Freiman PC, Bratu EA. Maintaining tissue architecture in immediate implant placement following extraction of natural teeth using custom healing screw. Biomed J Sci-Tech Res 2018;7(5). DOI: 10.26717/ BJSTR.2018.07.001554.
  18. Akin R. A new concept in maintaining the emergence profile in immediate posterior implant placement: the anatomic harmony abutment. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016;74(12):2385-92.
  19. Gümüş HÖ, Albayrak H, Kocaağaoğlu H, Etöz O. An alternative healing abutment production technique for deeply placed implants: a case report. J Oral Implantol 2015;41(3):320-2.
  20. Celik N, Binnetoglu D, Ilday NO, Hacimuftuoglu A, Seven N. The cytotoxic and oxidative effects of restorative materials in cultured human gingival fibroblasts. Drug Chem Toxicol 2021;44(5):502-7.
  21. Kraus D, Wolfgarten M, Enkling N, Helfgen EH, Frentzen M, Probstmeier R et al. In-vitro cytocompatibility of dental resin monomers on osteoblast-like cells. J Dent 2017;65(1):76-82.
  22. Wittneben J-G, Buser D, Belser UC, Brägger U. Peri-implant soft tissue conditioning with provisional restorations in the esthetic zone: the dynamic compression technique. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2013;33(4):447-55.
  23. Roy M, Loutan L, Garavaglia G, Hashim D. Removal of osseointegrated dental implants: a systematic review of explantation techniques. Clin Oral Investig 2020;24(1):47-60.
  24. Perez Davidi M, Beyth N, Sterer N, Feuerstein O, Weiss EI. Effect of liquid-polish coating on in vivo biofilm accumulation on provisional restorations: part 1. Quintessence Int 2007;38(7):591-6.
  25. Löe H, Schiott CR. The effect of mouthrinses and topical application of chlorhexidine on the development of dental plaque and gingivitis in man. J Periodontal Res 1970;5(2):79-83.
  26. Zhao H, Hu J, Zhao L. Adjunctive subgingival application of chlorhexidine gel in nonsurgical periodontal treatment for chronic periodontitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Oral Health 2020;20(1):34.
Tags: , , , , ,