You are currently viewing Alternativas no manejo de tecidos moles para longevidade da saúde peri-implantar: Revisão da literatura

Alternativas no manejo de tecidos moles para longevidade da saúde peri-implantar: Revisão da literatura

RESUMO

Objetivo: revisar as possíveis alternativas no manejo de tecidos moles na reabilitação de implantes dentários com intuito de preservação tecidual de longo prazo. Material e métodos: as palavras-chave utilizadas neste estudo foram interdental papilla, dental tissue conditioning, dental prosthesis implant-supported, não sendo combinadas. Buscas foram realizadas nas bases de dados eletrônicas PubMed, Scielo e Bireme entre os anos de 2003 e 2021. Os critérios de inclusão foram estudos clínicos randomizados, revisões sistemáticas, metanálises e casos clínicos no idioma inglês. Já os critérios de exclusão foram: carta ao editor e revisão da literatura. Resultados: foram selecionados dez artigos clínicos de caso-controle e quatro artigos de estudo clínico randomizado, três estudos retrospectivos e quatro revisões sistemáticas com metanálise. Os artigos avaliaram os resultados de enxerto gengival livre, de enxerto de tecido conjuntivo e membranas, do uso de ácido hialurônico e de plaquetas ricas em fibrina (PRF), a influência do biotipo/ fenótipo gengival, da peça protética na manutenção do volume da mucosa peri-implantar. Conclusão: o manejo dos tecidos moles peri-implantares é um desafio, e todas as alternativas descritas possuem limitações. Portanto, mais estudos são necessários para avaliar a longevidade estética dos implantes dentários.

Palavras-chave – Papila interdental; Condicionamento tecidual dental; Prótese sobre implante.


ABSTRACT

The objective of this study was to review the possible alternatives in the management of soft tissue in the rehabilitation of dental implants with long-term tissue preservation. The keywords used in this study were interdental papilla, gingival biotype, implantsupported dental prosthesis, not be combined. Databases such as PubMed, Scielo, and Bireme were the sources of the studies, which were between 2003 and 2021. Inclusion criteria were: randomized clinical trials, systematic-review with meta-analyses, and clinical cases. The exclusion criteria were: letters to the editor and literature reviews. There were ten clinical case-control articles and four randomized clinical studies, three retrospective studies, and four systematic-review with meta-analyses. The articles evaluated the results of a free gingival graft, connective tissue, membrane gra s, hyaluronic acid, and fibrin-rich platelets (PRF), the influence of gingival biotype/phenotype, prosthetic piece, in the maintenance of the volume of the peri-implant mucosa. Then, the peri-implant management of soft tissues is a challenge, and all the alternatives described have limitations. Therefore, more studies are needed to assess the aesthetic longevity of dental implants.

Key words – Interdental papilla; Dental tissue conditioning; Dental prosthesis implant-supported.

Referências

  1. Brånemark PI. Osseointegration and its experimental background. J Prosthet Dent. 1983;50(3):399-410.
  2. Kan JYK, Rungcharassaeng K, Umezu K, Kois JC. Dimensions of peri-implant mucosa: an evaluation of maxillary anterior single implants in humans. J Periodontol 2003;74(4):557-62.
  3. Agudio G, Cortellini P, Buti J, Pini Prato G. Periodontal conditions of sites treated with gingival augmentation surgery compared with untreated contralateral homologous sites: an 18 to 35 year long-term study. J Periodontol 2016;87(12):1371-8.
  4. Agustín-Panadero R, Bustamante-Hernández N, Labaig-Rueda C, Fons-Font A, Fernández-Estevan L, Solá-Ruíz MF. Influence of biologically oriented preparation technique on peri-implant tissues; prospective randomized clinical trial with three-year follow-up. Part II: soft tissues J Clin Med. 2019;8(12):2223.
  5. Kim HJ, Chang H, Kim S, Seol YJ, Kim H Il. Periodontal biotype modification using a volume-stable collagen matrix and autogenous subepithelial connective tissue graft for the treatment of gingival recession: a case series. J Periodontal Implant Sci 2018;48(6):395-404.
  6. Feuillet D, Keller J-F, Agossa K. Interproximal tunneling with a customized connective tissue graft: a microsurgical technique for interdental papilla reconstruction. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2018;38(6):833-9.
  7. Souza CA, Pinho RCM, De Siqueira RAC, De Andrade ALFS, De Carvalho Farias Vajgel B, Da Silva Neto JC, et al. Factors influencing the presence of papilla between adjacent implants and between a tooth and an implant. Acta Stomatol Croat 2019;53(4):337-46.
  8. Karakış Akcan S, Güler B, Hatipoğlu H. The effect of different gingival phenotypes on dimensional stability of free gingival graft: a comparative 6-month clinical study. J Periodontol 2019;90(7):709-17.
  9. Kan J, Rungcharassaeng K. Site development for anterior implant esthetics: the dentulous site. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2001;22(3):221-6.
  10. Phillips K, Kois J. Aesthetic peri-implant site development. The restorative connection. Dent Clin North Am 1998;42(1):57-70.
  11. Agudio G, Nieri M, Rotundo R, Cortellini P, Pini Prato G. Free gingival grafts to increase keratinized tissue: a retrospective long-term evaluation (10 to 25 years) of outcomes. J Periodontol 2008;79(4):587-94.
  12. Huang L-H, Neiva REF, Wang H-L. Factors affecting the outcomes of coronally advanced flap root coverage procedure. J Periodontol 2005;76(10):1729-34.
  13. Giannobile W, Jung R, Schwarz F. Evidence-based knowledge on the aesthetics and maintenance of peri-implant soft tissues: osteology foundation consensus report part 1—effects of soft tissue augmentation procedures on the maintenance of peri- implant soft tissue health. Clin Oral Impl Res 2018;29(15):7-10.
  14. Ozsagir ZB, Saglam E, Sen Yilmaz B, Choukroun J, Tunali M. Injectable platelet-rich fibrin and microneedling for gingival augmentation in thin periodontal phenotype: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol 2020;47(4):489-99.
  15. Lee WP, Kim HJ, Yu SJ, Kim BO. Six month clinical evaluation of interdental papilla reconstruction with injectable hyaluronic acid gel using an image analysis system. J Esthet Restor Dent 2016;28(4):221-30.
  16. Mandel I, Farkasdi S, Varga G, Nagy ÁK. Comparative evaluation of two hyaluronic acid gel products for the treatment of interdental papillary defects. Acta Stomatol Croat 2020;54(3):227-37.
  17. Ni J, Shu R, Li C. Efficacy evaluation of hyaluronic acid gel for the restoration of gingival interdental papilla defects. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2019;77(12):2467-74. [On-line]. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2019.06.190. Acesso em: Acesso em: 23-6-2021.
  18. Chan HL, George F, Wang IC, Suárez F, Janet A, Hom K, et al. A randomized controlled trial to compare aesthetic outcomes of immediately placed implants with and without immediate provisionalization. J Clin Periodontol 2019;46:1061-9.
  19. Qian Cheng, Ying-Ying Su, Xin Wang, Su Chen. Clinical outcomes following immediate loading of single-tooth implants in the esthetic zone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2020;35(1):167-77.
  20. Zhenya Su, Yuan Chen, Maoxia Wang, Anchun Mo. Evaluation of immediate implantation and provisionalization combined with guided bone regeneration by a flap approach in the maxillary esthetic zone: a retrospective controlled study. Materials (Basel) 2021;14(3874):1-11.
  21. Yan Q, Xiao L, Su M, Mei Y, Shi B. Soft and hard tissue changes following immediate placement or immediate restoration of single-tooth implants in the esthetic zone : a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2016;31(6):1327-40.
  22. Garabetyan J, Malet J, Kerner S, Detzen L, Carra MC, Bouchard P. The relationship between dental implant papilla and dental implant mucosa around single-tooth implant in the esthetic area: a retrospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2019;30(12):1229-37.
  23. Khoshhal M, Vafaei F, Najafi M, Nikkhah M. Comparison of interdental papilla around single implants in the anterior maxilla between two implant systems: a cohort study. Tabriz Univ Med Sci 2018;12(1):38-44. [On-line]. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.15171/joddd.2018.006. Acesso em: Acesso em: 26-6-2021.
  24. Wittneben J-G, Buser D, Belser UC, Brägger U. Peri-implant soft tissue conditioning with provisional restorations in the esthetic zone: the dynamic compression technique. Int J Periodontics Restor Dent 2013;33(4):447-55.
  25. Kois J. Predictable single tooth peri-implant esthetics: five diagnostic keys. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2001;22(3):199-206.
  26. Fu J-H, Yeh C-Y, Chan H-L, Tatarakis N, Leong DJM, Wang H-L. Tissue biotype and its relation to the underlying bone morphology. J Periodontol 2010;81(4):569-74.
  27. Choukroun J, Ghanaati S. Reduction of relative centrifugation force within injectable platelet-rich-fibrin (PRF) concentrates advances patients’ own inflammatory cells, platelets and growth factors: the first introduction to the low speed centrifugation concept. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2018;44(1):87-95.
  28. Miron R, Choukroun J. Platelet rich fibrin in regenerative dentistry: biological background and clinical indications. Oxford, RU: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2017;1:1-14.
  29. Fakhari A BC. Applications and emerging trends of hyaluronic acid in tissue engineering, as a dermal filler and in osteoarthritis treatment. Acta Biomater 2013;9:7081-92.
  30. Becker W, Gabitov I, Stepanov M, Kois J, Smidt A BB. Minimally invasive treatment for papillae deficiencies in the esthetic zone: a pilot study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2010;12(1):1-8.
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,