You are currently viewing Implantes dentários extralongos extrasinusais em osso zigomático utilizando perfuração ultrassônica: série de casos com 46 implantes e 18 pacientes com 24 meses de acompanhamento

Implantes dentários extralongos extrasinusais em osso zigomático utilizando perfuração ultrassônica: série de casos com 46 implantes e 18 pacientes com 24 meses de acompanhamento

RESUMO

Objetivo: executar e avaliar a técnica utilizando a terapia de implantes dentários zigomáticos com perfuração do corpo do osso zigomático feita com pontas diamantadas ultrassônicas. Material e métodos: 18 pacientes desdentados superiores foram selecionados e receberam pelo menos um implante zigomático instalado com a técnica extrasinusal e utilizando a perfuração ultrassônica, conforme o planejamento virtual para completa solução dos casos. As avaliações dos resultados primários foram baseadas nas taxas de sobrevida do implante e complicações pós-operatórias. Resultados: foram inseridos 46 implantes zigomáticos. As próteses totais sobre implantes foram entregues em até 72 horas após as cirurgias. O acompanhamento máximo após a cirurgia foi de 18 meses (3-24 meses). O tempo operatório foi maior utilizando a cirurgia óssea piezoelétrica, no entanto as cirurgias foram mais confortáveis com o uso de instrumentos ultrassônicos, do ponto de vista do cirurgião operador. A sobrevida do implante foi de 100%, não sendo observadas complicações pós-operatórias nestes 18 pacientes. Conclusão: a cirurgia óssea piezoelétrica se mostrou uma alternativa viável à perfuração tradicional para cirurgia de implante zigomático feita com broca helicoidal. A técnica mostrou sua aplicabilidade, resultando em menos morbidade e maior previsibilidade clínica.

Palavras-chave – Implantes dentários; Maxila atrófica; Zigomático; Enxertos ósseos; Ultrassom cirúrgico.

ABSTRACT

Objective: to manage and evaluate a technique using zygomatic dental implants by perforating the zygoma body using ultrasound diamond tips. Material and methods: 18 completely edentulous patients were selected and received at least 1 zygomatic implant installed under the extra-sinus technique and by ultrasound instrumentation, according to the computerized virtual planning. The primary outcomes were evaluated according to the survival rates and post-operative complications. Results: overall, 46 zygoma implants were inserted. All implant-supported, complete, fixed prostheses were delivered up to 72 hours after surgeries. The maximum follow-up time was 18 months (3-18 months). The operative time was greater for piezoelectric instrumentation; however, all surgeries were perceived more comfortable in this way according to the operator. Dental implant survival was 100%, and no complications were observed for these 18 patients. Conclusion: bone piezo surgery is a viable alternative to traditional osteotomy for zygoma dental implants using helicoidal burs. The applicability of this technique was demonstrated resulting in less morbidity are more clinical predictability.

Key words – Dental implants; Atrophic maxilla; Zygomatic bone; Bone grafts; Surgical ultrasound.

Referências

  1. Oliveira NM, Shaddox LM, Toda C, Paleari AG, Pero AC, Compagnoni MA. Methods for evaluation of masticatory efficiency in conventional complete denture wearers: a systematized review. Oral Health Dent Manag 2014;13(3):757-62.
  2. Hansson S, Halldin A. Alveolar ridge resorption after tooth extraction: a consequence of a fundamental principle of bone physiology. J Dent Biomech 2012;3:1758736012456543.
  3. Aparicio C, Ouazzani W, Hatano N. The use of zygomatic implants for prosthetic rehabilitation of the severely resorbed maxilla. Periodontol 2000 2008;47:162-71.
  4. Busato A, Vismara V, Grecchi F, Grecchi E, Lauritano D. Surgiplanner: a new method for one step oral rehabilitation of severe atrophic maxilla. Oral Implantol (Rome) 2017;10(3):325-34.
  5. Jaumotte M, Grobet P, Pepinster F, Thonnart F, Nizet JL, Gilon Y. Contribution of 3D technology for maxillofacial surgery. Rev Med Liege 2020;75(4):240-2.
  6. Grandi T, Faustini F, Casotto F, Samarani R, Svezia L, Radano P. Immediate fixed rehabilitation of severe maxillary atrophies using trans-sinus tilted implants with or without sinus bone grafting: one-year results from a randomised controlled trial. Int J Oral Implantol (Berl) 2019;12(2):141-52.
  7. Lassausaie A, Sesqué A, Barthélémy I, Depeyre A. Virtual surgery planning and three-dimensional printing template for osteotomy of the zygoma to correct untreated zygomaticomaxillary complex fracture. J Craniofac Surg 2020;31(4):1142-5.
  8. Ernoult C, Bouletreau P, Meyer C, Aubry S, Breton P, Bachelet JT. Reconstruction assisted by 3D printing in maxillofacial surgery. Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac Chir Orale 2015;116(2):95-102.
  9. Tehemar SH. Factors affecting heat generation during implant site preparation: a review of biologic observations and future considerations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14(1):127-36.
  10. Sharawy M, Misch CE, Weller N, Tehemar S. Heat generation during implant drilling: the significance of motor speed. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2002;60(10):1160-9.
  11. Vercellotti T. Piezoelectric surgery in implantology: a case report – a new piezoelectric ridge expansion technique. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2000;20(4):358-65.
  12. Vercellotti T, Stacchi C, Russo C, Rebaudi A, Vincenzi G, Pratella U et al. Ultrasonic implant site preparation using piezosurgery: a multicenter case series study analyzing 3,579 implants with a 1- to 3-year follow-up. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2014;34(1):11-8.
  13. Blus C, Szmukler-Moncler S, Khoury P, Orru G. Immediate implants placed in infected and noninfected sites after atraumatic tooth extraction and placement with ultrasonic bone surgery. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2015;17(suppl.1):e287-97.
  14. Esposito M, Barausse C, Balercia A, Pistilli R, Ippolito DR, Felice P. Conventional drills vs piezoelectric surgery preparation for placement of four immediately loaded zygomatic oncology implants in edentulous maxillae: results from 1-year split-mouth randomised controlled trial. Eur J Oral Implantol 2017;10(2):147-58.
  15. Pellegrino G, Tarsitano A, Taraschi V, Vercellotti T, Marchetti C. Simplifying zygomatic implant site preparation using ultrasonic navigation: a technical note. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2018;33(3):67-71.
  16. Bassi F, Cicciu M, Di Lenarda R, Galindo Moreno P, Galli F, Herford AS et al. Piezoelectric bone surgery compared with conventional rotary instruments in oral surgery and implantology: summary and consensus statements of the International Piezoelectric Surgery Academy Consensus Conference 2019. Int J Oral Implantol (Berl) 2020;13(3):235-9.
  17. Kuabara MR, Ferreira EJ, Gulinelli JL, Paz LG. Rehabilitation with zygomatic implants: a treatment option for the atrophic edentulous maxilla – 9-year follow-up. Quintessence Int 2010;41(1):9-12.
  18. Malevez C. Zygomatic anchorage concept in full edentulism. Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac 2012;113(4):299-306.
  19. Mozzati M, Gallesio G, Goker F, Tumedei M, Cesare P, Tedesco A et al. Immediate oral rehabilitation with quad zygomatic implants: ultrasonic technique vs conventional drilling. J Oral Implantol 2021;47(3):205-13.
  20. Mozzati M, Mortellaro C, Arata V, Gallesio G, Previgliano V. Rehabilitation with 4 zygomatic implants with a new surgical protocol using ultrasonic technique. J Craniofac Surg 2015;26(3):722-8.
  21. Bedrossian E, Sullivan RM, Fortin Y, Malo P, Indresano T. Fixed-prosthetic implant restoration of the edentulous maxilla: a systematic pretreatment evaluation method. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008;66(1):112-22.
  22. Tavelli C, Tedesco A. Survival and complication rate of zygomatic implants: a systematic review. J Oral Implantol 2022
  23. Goker F, Grecchi E, Del Fabbro M, Tedesco A, Borgonovo A, Bedendo A et al. Oral rehabilitation with unilateral zygomatic implants: a case series of 32 patients. Int J Oral Implantol (Berl) 2022;15(2):181-90.
  24. Manson PN, Hoopes JE, Su CT. Structural pillars of the facial skeleton: an approach to the management of Le Fort fractures. Plast Reconstr Surg 1980;66(1):54-62.
  25. Couly G. Bone statics of the face: the frontal-sphenoid-pterygoid bone pillars as biomechanic equivalents of the mandible. Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac 1975;76(8):607-19.
  26. Chrcanovic BR, Pedrosa AR, Neto Custodio AL. Zygomatic implants: a critical review of the surgical techniques. Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013;17(1):1-9.
  27. Crespi R, Vinci R, Cappare P, Romanos GE, Gherlone E. A clinical study of edentulous patients rehabilitated according to the “all on four” immediate function protocol. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2012;27(2):428-34.
  28. Erkapers M, Ekstrand K, Baer RA, Toljanic JA, Thor A. Patient satisfaction following dental implant treatment with immediate loading in the edentulous atrophic maxilla. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011;26(2):356-64.
  29. Sagheb K, Kumar VV, Azaripour A, Walter C, Al-Nawas B, Kammerer PW. Comparison of conventional twist drill protocol and piezosurgery for implant insertion: an ex vivo study on different bone types. Clin Oral Implants Res 2017;28(2):207-13.
  30. Iraqui O, Lakhssassi N, Berrada S, Merzouk N. Atraumatic bone expansion: interest of piezo-surgery, conicals expanders and immediate implantation combination. Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac Chir Orale 2016;117(3):151-7.
Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,