Referências Bibliográficas:

1. Siadat H, Alikhasi M, Beyabanaki E. Interim prosthesis options for dental implants. Journal of Prosthodontics. 2017;26(4):331-8.
2. Sartori IADM, Sartori EM, Uhlendorf Y, Gurgel AC. Reabilitação de maxilas com implantes: importância do diagnóstico protético prévio. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant. 2016;1(1):12-38.
3. Monaco C, Ragazzini N, Scheda L, Evangelisti E. A fully digital approach to replicate functional and aesthetic parameters in implant-supported full-arch rehabilitation. journal of prosthodontic research. 2018;62(3):383-5.
4. Siqueira R, Galli M, Chen Z, Mendonça G, Meirelles L, Wang H-L, et al. Intraoral scanning reduces procedure time and improves patient comfort in fixed prosthodontics and implant dentistry: a systematic review. Clinical oral investigations. 2021:1-15.
5. Jemt T, Lekholm U. Measurements of bone and frame‐work deformations induced by misfit of implant superstructures. A pilot study in rabbits. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 1998;9(4):272-80.
6. Jemt T, Bäck T, Petersson A. Precision of CNC-milled titanium frameworks for implant treatment in the edentulous jaw. International Journal of Prosthodontics. 1999;12(3).
7. Revilla‐León M, Kois DE, Kois JC. A guide for maximizing the accuracy of intraoral digital scans. Part 1: Operator factors. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry. 2023;35(1):230-40.
8. Revilla‐León M, Kois DE, Kois JC. A guide for maximizing the accuracy of intraoral digital scans: Part 2—Patient factors. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry. 2023;35(1):241-9.
9. Monaco C, Scheda L, Ciocca L, Zucchelli G. The prototype concept in a full digital implant workflow. The Journal of the American Dental Association. 2018;149(10):918-23.
10. Monaco C, Arena A, Pallotti G, di Fiore A, Scheda L. Digital bar prototype technique for full-arch rehabilitation on implants. The Journal of the American Dental Association. 2019;150(6):549-55.
11. Ntovas P, Spanopoulou M, Martin W, Sykaras N. Superimposition of intraoral scans of an edentulous arch with implants and implant-supported provisional restoration, implementing a novel implant prosthetic scan body. Journal of Prosthodontic Research. 2023;67(3):475-80.
12. Papaspyridakos P, Kim YJ, Finkelman M, El‐Rafie K, Weber HP. Digital Evaluation of Three Splinting Materials Used to Fabricate Verification Jigs for Full‐Arch Implant Prostheses: A Comparative Study. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry. 2017;29(2):102-9.
13. Iturrate M, Minguez R, Pradies G, Solaberrieta E. Obtaining reliable intraoral digital scans for an implant-supported complete-arch prosthesis: a dental technique. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2019;121(2):237-41.
14. Papaspyridakos P, Chen Y-w, Gonzalez-Gusmao I, Att W. Complete digital workflow in prosthesis prototype fabrication for complete-arch implant rehabilitation: A technique. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2019;122(3):189-92.
15. Meneghetti P, Moura GF, Tavelli L, Li J, Siqueira R, Wang HL, et al. A fully digital approach for implant fixed complete dentures: A case report. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry. 2021.
16. Rosmaninho A, Vedovato E, Kois JC, Revilla‐León M. Altered reverse impression method involving extraoral digitalization of a verification jig for the fabrication of implant‐supported prosthesis by using a complete‐digital workflow. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry. 2023.
17. Able FB, de Mattias Sartori IA, Thomé G, Melo ACM. Retrospective, cross-sectional study on immediately loaded implant-supported mandibular fixed complete-arch prostheses fabricated with the passive fit cementation technique. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2018;119(1):60-6.
18. Papaspyridakos P, Vazouras K, Chen Yw, Kotina E, Natto Z, Kang K, et al. Digital vs conventional implant impressions: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Journal of Prosthodontics. 2020;29(8):660-78.
19. Pereira ALC, Curinga MRS, Segundo HVM, Carreiro AdFP. Factors that influence the accuracy of intraoral scanning of total edentulous arches rehabilitated with multiple implants: A systematic review. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2023;129(6):855-62.
20. Ercoli C, Geminiani A, Feng C, Lee H. The influence of verification jig on framework fit for nonsegmented fixed implant‐supported complete denture. Clinical implant dentistry and related research. 2012;14:e188-e95.
21. Prasad S, Monaco Jr EA. Repairing an implant titanium milled framework using laser welding technology: a clinical report. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2009;101(4):221-5.
22. Stawarczyk B, Keul C, Eichberger M, Figge D, Edelhoff D, Lümkemann N. Three generations of zirconia: From veneered to monolithic. Part I. Quintessence International. 2017;48(5).
23. Stawarczyk B, Keul C, Eichberger M, Figge D, Edelhoff D, Lümkemann N. Three generations of zirconia: From veneered to monolithic. Part II. Quintessence International. 2017;48(6).
24. Papaspyridakos P, Chochlidakis K, Kang K, Chen Yw, Alghfeli A, Kudara Y, et al. Digital workflow for implant rehabilitation with double full‐arch monolithic zirconia prostheses. Journal of Prosthodontics. 2020;29(6):460-5.
25. Câmara C. Análise morfológica tridimensional do sorriso. Rev Clín Ortod Dental Press. 2012;11(3):10-24.
26. Coachman C, Calamita M. Digital smile design: a tool for treatment planning and communication in esthetic dentistry. Quintessence Dent Technol. 2012;35:103-11.
27. Brandão RCB, Brandão LBC. Finishing procedures in orthodontics: dental dimensions and proportions (microesthetics). Dental press journal of orthodontics. 2013;18:147-74.