Referências

1. Seiler M et al. Resorbable scaffolds for alveolar ridge augmentation procedures: a systematic review. International Journal of Implant Dentistry 2026;12(1):27.
2. Autologous bone graft: Is it still the gold standard? – injury [On-line]. Disponível em <https://www.injuryjournal.com/article/S0020-1383(21)00094-2/fulltext>. Acesso em: 10-8-2026.
3. Shah A et al. Bone grafts and bone substitutes in dentistry. Journal of Oral Research and Review 2016;8:36.
4. Szwed-Georgiou A et al. Bioactive materials for bone regeneration: biomolecules and delivery systems. ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering 2023;9(9):5222-54.
5. Strategies for bone regeneration: from graft to tissue engineering – PMC [On-line]. Disponível em <https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7865467/>. Acesso em: 10-8-2026.
6. El-Rashidy AA et al. Effect of polymeric matrix stiffness on osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem/progenitor cells: concise review. Polymers 2021;13(17):2950.
7. Bozza B et al. Synthetic biomaterials for alveolar bone regeneration: a systematic review of clinical evidence. Materials 2025;18(23):5328.
8. Apaza-Bedoya K et al. Efficacy of alveolar ridge preservation with xenografts and resorbable socket sealing materials in the esthetic region: a systematic review with meta-analyses. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research 2024;26(1):4-14.
9. Huang L et al. Advancements in GelMA bioactive hydrogels: strategies for infection control and bone tissue regeneration. Theranostics 2025;15(2):460-93.
10. Wang H, Kang J. Bone grafts and synthetic substitutes in dental applications: a comprehensive review of molecular mechanisms, materials evolution, and clinical perspective. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology 2026;13.
11. Gomes YVR et al. Biological responses to biomaterials: a review. Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research v. 58, p. e14599.
12. Matyszczak G et al. Sonochemical synthesis of low-dimensional nanostructures and their applications – a review. Materials 2024;17(22):5488.
13. Duarte ND et al. Local delivery of genistein in peri-implant defects enhances osseointegration in ovariectomized rats. Calcified Tissue International 2026;117(1):33.
14. Macedo LG et al. Enhancing bone repair: impact of raloxifene-functionalized cerabone on rat calvarial defects. Journal of Functional Biomaterials 2025;16(2):59.
15. Gomes MB et al. Bioactive glass modified by sonochemistry improves peri-implant bone repair in ovariectomized rats. Biomimetics 2025;10(12):821.
16. Sonochemical time standardization for bioactive materials used in periimplantar defects filling. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry 2019;56:437-46.
17. Bone repair with raloxifene and bioglass nanoceramic composite in animal experiment. Connective Tissue Research.
18. Duarte ND et al. Sonification of deproteinized bovine bone functionalized with genistein enhances bone repair in peri-implant bone defects in ovariectomized rats. Journal of Functional Biomaterials 2024;15(11):328.
19. Kalyanaraman H, Schall N, Pilz RB. Nitric Oxide and Cyclic GMP Functions in Bone. Nitric oxide: biology and chemistry 2018;76:62-70.
20. Inoue BKN et al. Synergic action of systemic risedronate and local rutherpy in peri-implantar repair of ovariectomized rats: biomechanical and molecular analysis. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2023;24(22):16153.