Aumento do fenótipo do tecido mole peri-implantar em área previamente acometida por peri-implantite: relato de caso com acompanhamento de três anos

Ana Carolina Ferreira Bonafé
Mestra e doutoranda em Periodontia – ICT-Unesp, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Instituto de Ciência e Tecnologia, São José dos Campos, São Paulo,
Brasil.
ORCID: 0000-0001-5685-0002

Amanda Rossato
Mestra, doutora, pós-doutoranda em Periodontia – ICT-Unesp, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Instituto de Ciência e Tecnologia, São José dos Campos, São
Paulo, Brasil.
ORCID: 0000-0001-9354-9446

Ingrid Fernandes Mathias-Santamaria
Mestra e doutora em Odontologia Restauradora – ICT-Unesp, Associate Professor in the Restorative Dentistry Division – University of Kentucky, University of Kentucky, College of Dentistry, Lexington, Kentucky, EUA.
ORCID: 0000-0003-2518-0135

Lucas Raineri Capeletti
Mestre em Implantodontia – UnB e doutorando em Periodontia – UFG, Faculdade de Odontologia, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás,
Brasil.
ORCID: 0000-0003-1146-3257

Mauro Pedrine Santamaria
Mestre e doutor em Periodontia – Unicamp, Associate Professor in the Center for Oral Health Research and Division of Periodontology – University of Kentucky, University of Kentucky, College of Dentistry, Lexington, Kentucky, EUA.
ORCID: 0000-0001-9468-0729

Marcelo Pereira Nunes
Mestre em Implantodontia – SLMandic e doutor em Periodontia – UFPE, Coordenador do Grupo Proimperio, Instituto Proimperio, São Paulo, Brasil
ORCID: 0000-0002-8285-5410.

 

DOI:  https://doi.org/10.71440/2675-5610.10.6.25.798-805.art

 

RESUMO

Paciente, sexo feminino, com 66 anos de idade, foi encaminhada com o objetivo de tratar a peri-implantite e melhorar a estabilidade dos tecidos ao redor dos implantes 25 e 26. A cirurgia com EGL foi conduzida após tratamento cirúrgico da peri-implantite e consistiu na realização do retalho posicionado apicalmente com EGL. A profundidade de sondagem (PS), índice da mucosa implantar (IMI), índice gengival modificado (IGm), índice de placa modificado (IPm), espessura da mucosa (EM), largura de TQ e recessão da mucosa peri-implantar (RMP). Alem disso, foi utilizado o escore estético rosa: papilas mesial (PM) e distal (PD), nível e contorno do tecido mole (NMT), deficiência do processo alveolar (DPA), e cor (CT) e textura (TT) do tecido foram avaliados inicialmente. Apos 3 anos, o implante #25 apresentou aumento de EM (1 mm para 2 mm) e TQ (0,5 mm para 2 mm), com redução da RMP (0,5 mm para 0 mm). Houve melhora na NMT (discrepância maior para ausência), CT (pouco natural para natural), cor e TT (diferença obvia para nenhuma diferença), enquanto PM e PD se mantiveram estáveis. A DPA mostrou melhora radiográfica. Para o implante 26, observou-se aumento de EM (1 mm para 2 mm) e TQ (0,5 mm para 2 mm), e redução da RMP (1,5 mm para 1 mm). Houve melhora em NMT (discrepância maior para menor), CT (pouco natural para natural), cor e TT (diferença obvia para nenhuma diferença), enquanto PM manteve-se ausente. A DPA também permaneceu leve. Os sítios atingiram PS ≤ 5 mm, IMI = 0, IGm = 1, IPm = 0 ao final do tratamento da peri-implantite e mantiveram estabilidade. O enxerto gengival livre (EGL) foi eficaz na modificação do fenótipo em sitio com histórico de peri-implantite, promovendo aumento de espessura e largura do tecido queratinizado, mantendo-se estável após três anos.

Palavras-chave: Implantes Dentarios, Estética, Peri-implantite, Terapia de Tecidos Moles, Tecido Conjuntivo.

 

Soft tissue phenotype augmentation in an area previously affected by periimplantitis: a case report with three-years of follow-up

 

ABSTRACT

A 66-years-old, female patient was referred for peri-implantitis treatment and soft tissue augmentation around implants #25 and #26. The FGG procedure was carried out following surgical management of peri-implantitis and involved the execution of an apically positioned flap combined with FGG. The following clinical parameters were assessed at baseline: probing depth (PD), modified plaque index (mPI), modified gingival index (mGI), implant mucosal index (IMI), mucosal thickness (MT), width of keratinized tissue (KT), and periimplant mucosal recession (PIMR). In addition, the Pink Esthetic Score (PES) was applied, including assessment of mesial (MP) and distal (DP) papillae, soft tissue level and contour (STLC), alveolar process deficiency (APD), as well as color (C ) and texture (T) of the periimplant soft tissues. After 3 years, implant #25 showed an increase in MT (1 mm to 2 mm) and KT (0.5 mm to 2 mm), with a reduction in PIMR (0.5 mm to 0 mm). STLC improved (major discrepancy to none), as did C and T (from obvious to no difference), while MP and DP remained stable. APD showed radiographic improvement. Implant #26 also showed increased MT (1 mm to 2 mm) and KT (0.5 mm to 2 mm), and PIMR reduction (1.5 mm to 1 mm). STLC improved (major to minor discrepancy), and both C and T improved (from obvious to no difference), while MP remained absent. APD also remained mild. Sites achieved PD ≤ 5 mm, IMI = 0, mGI = 1, and mPI = 0 at the end of peri-implantitis treatment and remained stable. The free gingival graft (FGG) was effective in modifying the peri-implant phenotype in a site with a history of peri-implantitis, promoting increased mucosal thickness and keratinized tissue width, with clinical and esthetic stability maintained over three years.

Keywords: Connective Tissue, Dental Implant, Esthetics, Peri-implantitis, Soft Tissue Therapy.

 

Referências

  1. Buser D, Sennerby L, De Bruyn H. Modern implant dentistry based on osseointegration: 50 years of progress, current trends and open questions. Periodontol 2000. 2017 Feb;73(1):7-21. https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12185
  2. Tavelli L, Barootchi S, Avila-Ortiz G, Urban IA, Giannobile WV, Wang HL. Peri-implant soft tissue phenotype modification and its impact on peri-implant health: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. J Periodontol. 2021 Jan;92(1):21-44. https://doi.org/10.1002/JPER.19-0716
  3. Ramseier CA. Diagnostic measures for monitoring and follow-up in periodontology and implant dentistry. Periodontol 2000. 2024 Jun;95(1):129-155. https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12588
  4. Sahrmann P, Kühl S, Dagassan-Berndt D, Bornstein MM, Zitzmann NU. Radiographic assessment of the peri-implant site. Periodontol 2000. 2024 Jun;95(1):70-86. https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12577
  5. Berglundh T, Armitage G, Araujo MG, Avila-Ortiz G, Blanco J, Camargo PM et al. Peri-implant diseases and conditions: Consensus report of workgroup 4 of the 2017 World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases and Conditions. J Clin Periodontol. 2018 Jun;45 Suppl 20:S286-S291. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12957
  6. Costa FO, Takenaka-Martinez S, Cota LO, Ferreira SD, Silva GL, Costa JE. Peri-implant disease in subjects with and without preventive maintenance: a 5-year follow-up. J Clin Periodontol. 2012 Feb;39(2):173-81. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2011.01819.x
  7. Monje A, Salvi GE. Diagnostic methods/parameters to monitor peri-implant conditions. Periodontol 2000. 2024 Jun;95(1):20-39. https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12584
  8. Thoma DS, Naenni N, Figuero E, Hämmerle CHF, Schwarz F, Jung RE, Sanz-Sánchez I. Effects of soft tissue augmentation procedures on peri-implant health or disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Mar;29 Suppl 15:32-49. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13114
  9. Monje A, Roccuzzo A, Buser D, Wang HL. Influence of buccal bone wall thickness on the peri-implant hard and soft tissue dimensional changes: A systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2023 Mar;34(3):157-176. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.14029
  10. Thoma DS, Mühlemann S, Jung RE. Critical soft-tissue dimensions with dental implants and treatment concepts. Periodontol 2000. 2014 Oct;66(1):106-18. https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12045
  11. Grischke J, Karch A, Wenzlaff A, Foitzik MM, Stiesch M, Eberhard J. Keratinized mucosa width is associated with severity of peri-implant mucositis. A cross-sectional study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2019 May;30(5):457-465. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13432
  12. Hosseini M, Worsaae N, Gotfredsen K. Tissue changes at implant sites in the anterior maxilla with and without connective tissue grafting: A five-year prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2020 Jan;31(1):18-28. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13540
  13. Thoma DS, Naenni N, Figuero E, Hämmerle CHF, Schwarz F, Jung RE, Sanz-Sánchez I. Effects of soft tissue augmentation procedures on peri-implant health or disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Mar;29 Suppl 15:32-49. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13114
  14. Lima VCDS, Miguel MMV, Ferraz LFF, Filho ABM, Jardini MAN, Santamaria MP. Use of platelet-rich fibrin membranes with single implant placement for peri-implant mucosal thickness augmentation: a case series study. Clin Adv Periodontics. 2022 Mar;12(1):17-20. https://doi.org/10.1002/cap.10143
  15. Lazzari TR, Jardini MAN, Castro Dos Santos N, da Silva Neves FL, da Silva Lima VC, de Melo Filho AB, Santamaria MP. Single implant placement in the maxillary aesthetic area with or without connective tissue grafting: A 1-year follow-up randomised clinical trial. Int J Oral Implantol (Berl). 2022 Mar 10;15(1):57-67.
  16. Stefanini M, Marzadori M, Sangiorgi M, Rendon A, Testori T, Zucchelli G. Complications and treatment errors in peri-implant soft tissue management. Periodontol 2000. 2023 Jun;92(1):263-277. https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12470
  17. Riley DS, Barber MS, Kienle GS, Aronson JK, von Schoen-Angerer T, Tugwell P et al. CARE guidelines for case reports: explanation and elaboration document. J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Sep;89:218-235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.04.026
  18. Fürhauser R, Florescu D, Benesch T, Haas R, Mailath G, Watzek G. Evaluation of soft tissue around single-tooth implant crowns: the pink esthetic score. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005 Dec;16(6):639-44. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01193.x
  19. Bouri A Jr, Bissada N, Al-Zahrani MS, Faddoul F, Nouneh I. Width of keratinized gingiva and the health status of the supporting tissues around dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008 Mar-Apr;23(2):323-6.
  20. Lin GH, Chan HL, Wang HL. The significance of keratinized mucosa on implant health: a systematic review. J Periodontol. 2013 Dec;84(12):1755-67. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2013.120688
  21. Mazzotti C, Stefanini M, Felice P, Bentivogli V, Mounssif I, Zucchelli G. Soft-tissue dehiscence coverage at peri-implant sites. Periodontol 2000. 2018 Jun;77(1):256-272. https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12220
  22. Oh SL, Masri RM, Williams DA, Ji C, Romberg E. Free gingival grafts for implants exhibiting lack of keratinized mucosa: a prospective controlled randomized clinical study. J Clin Periodontol. 2017 Feb;44(2):195-203. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12660
  23. Díaz-Sánchez M, Soto-Peñaloza D, Peñarrocha-Oltra D, Peñarrocha-Diago M. Influence of supracrestal tissue attachment thickness on radiographic bone level around dental implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Periodontal Res. 2019 Dec;54(6):573-588. https://doi.org/10.1111/jre.12663
  24. Puzio M, Hadzik J, Błaszczyszyn A, Gedrange T, Dominiak M. Soft tissue augmentation around dental implants with connective tissue graft (CTG) and xenogenic collagen matrix (XCM). 1-year randomized control trail. Ann Anat. 2020 Jul;230:151484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aanat.2020.151484
  25. Puisys A, Linkevicius T. The influence of mucosal tissue thickening on crestal bone stability around bone-level implants. A prospective controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015 Feb;26(2):123-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12301
  26. Linkevicius T, Puisys A, Linkeviciene L, Peciuliene V, Schlee M. Crestal bone stability around implants with horizontally matching connection after soft tissue thickening: a prospective clinical trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015 Jun;17(3):497-508. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12155
  27. Monje A, González-Martín O, Ávila-Ortiz G. Impact of peri-implant soft tissue characteristics on health and esthetics. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2023 Jan;35(1):183-196. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.13003
  28. Bienz SP, Pirc M, Papageorgiou SN, Jung RE, Thoma DS. The influence of thin as compared to thick peri-implant soft tissues on aesthetic outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2022 Jun;33 Suppl 23(Suppl 23):56-71. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13789
  29. Blanco C, Liñares A, Dopico J, Pico A, Sobrino T, Leira Y, Blanco J. Peri-implantitis, systemic inflammation, and dyslipidemia: a cross-sectional biochemical study. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2021 Oct;51(5):342-351. https://doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2100920046
  30. Jung RE, Becker K, Bienz SP, Dahlin C, Donos N, Hammächer C et al. Effect of peri-implant mucosal thickness on esthetic outcomes and the efficacy of soft tissue augmentation procedures: Consensus report of group 2 of the SEPA/DGI/OF workshop. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2022 Jun;33 Suppl 23(Suppl 23):100-108. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13955