Fluxo digital em reabilitação estética por meio de laminados cerâmicos

Referências

van Noort R. The future of dental devices is digital. Dent Mater 2012;28(1):3-12.

Papi P, Di Murro B, Penna D, Pompa G. Digital prosthetic workflow during COVID-19 pandemic to limit infection risk in dental practice. Oral Dis 2021;27(suppl.3):723-6.

Stanley M, Paz AG, Miguel I, Coachman C. Fully digital workflow, integrating dental scan, smile design and CAD-CAM: case report. BMC Oral Health 2018;18(1):134.

Coachman C, Van Dooren E, Gürel G, Landsberg CJ, Calamita MA, Bichacho N. Smile design: from digital treatment planning to clinical reality. In: Cohen M, editor. Interdisciplinary treatment planning. Vol 2: comprehensive case studies. Chicago: Quintessence, 2012. p.119-74.

Lee JH, Son K, Lee KB. Marginal and internal fit of ceramic restorations fabricated using digital scanning and conventional impressions: a clinical study. J Clin Med 2020;14;9(12):4035.

Chiu A, Chen YW, Hayashi J, Sadr A. Accuracy of CAD/CAM digital impressions with different intraoral scanner parameters. Sensors (Basel) 2020;20(4):1157.

Schweiger J, Güth J-F, Edelhoff D, Seidel K, Graf T. Application of 3D-printed colored 3D-models for the fabrication of full ceramic restorations: a technical report. J Esthet Restor Dent 2022;34(1):235-43.

Poggio CE, Bonfiglioli R, Dosoli R. A patient presentation: planning and executing a difficult case in a full digital workflow. J Esthet Restor Dent 2021;33(1):135-42.

Ahlholm P, Sipilä K, Vallittu P, Jakonen M, Kotiranta U. Digital versus conventional impressions in fixed prosthodontics: a review. J Prosthodont 2018;27(1):35-41.

Zeltner M, Sailer I, Mühlemann S, Özcan M, Hämmerle CH, Benic GI. Randomized controlled within-subject evaluation of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of lithium disilicate single crowns. Part III: marginal and internal fit. J Prosthet Dent 2017;117(3):354-62.

Sailer I, Benic GI, Fehmer V, Hämmerle CHF, Mühlemann S. Randomized controlled within-subject evaluation of digital and conventional workflows for the fabrication of lithium disilicate single crowns. Part II: CAD-CAM versus conventional laboratory procedures. J Prosthet Dent 2017;118(1):43-8.

De Angelis P, Passarelli PC, Gasparini G, Boniello R, D’Amato G, De Angelis S. Monolithic CAD-CAM lithium disilicate versus monolithic CAD-CAM zirconia for single implant-supported posterior crowns using a digital workflow: a 3-year cross-sectional retrospective study. J Prosthet Dent 2020;123(2):252-6.

Cardelli P, Serafini N, Sinjari B, Murmura G, Özcan M. Reliability analysis of lithium disilicate crowns: effect of veneering and milling production workflow. J Prosthodont 2016;25(8):623-8.

Magne P, Belser UC. Novel porcelain laminate preparation approach driven by a diagnostic mock-up. J Esthet Restor Dent 2004;16(1):7-16.

Wismeijer D, Mans R, van Genuchten M, Reijers HA. Patients’ preferences when comparing analogue implant impressions using a polyether impression material versus digital impressions (Intraoral Scan) of dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014;25(10):1113-8.

Lin WS, Harris BT, Ozdemir E, Morton D. Maxillary rehabilitation with a CAD/CAM-fabricated, long-term interim and anatomic contour definitive prosthesis with a digital workflow: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2013;110(1):1-7.